The Discovery of a Genetic Calculator and Checksum.

overview article by Craig Paardekooper

Ref : http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?t=655&page=5

 

 

The French scientist Jean Claude Perez this year published a very interesting discovery that shows some very remarkable symmetries within the genetic code.

These symmetries are perfect balances in the frequency of occurrence of the 64 codons within the human genome.

Allow me to describe what he found -

There are 64 codons in the universal genetic code table. What Perez found was that these 64 codons occur in different proportions in the human genome - some occur more frequently than others. In the entire human genome there are just over 2.8 billion codons. He used a computer to count the number of occurrences of each of the 64 different codons in the genome, and then he entered this number next to the codon in the genetic code table.

When he did this an absolutely incredible pattern emerged.

Allow me to describe what he found - It is best for me to do this in pictures -





In each of the tables above you will see dark areas and light areas. Perez compared the frequency of occurence of the codons in the dark areas to the frequency of occurence of the codons in the light areas. Amazingly, what he found was that the ratio of dark to light for each table above is as follows.


Table 1

When the Codon Table is divided into 2 groups each of 32 codons, 32 codons in the dark group are found the same number of times in the human genome as the last 32 codons in the light group. So the ratio is 1 : 1


Table 2

When the Codon Table is divided into 4 groups each of 16 codons, the ratio of the dark groups to the light groups is 1 : 1 - 1/(2 phi)


Table 3

When the Codon Table is divided into 8 groups each of 8 codons, the ratio of the dark groups to the light groups is 1 : 1


Table 4

When the Codon Table is divided into 16 groups each of 4 codons, the ratio of the dark groups to the light groups is 1 : 1 - 1/(2 phi)


Table 5

When the Codon Table is divided into 32 groups each of 2 codons, the ratio of the dark groups to the light groups is 1 : 1


Table 6

When the Codon Table is divided into 64 groups each of 1 codon, the ratio of the dark groups to the light groups is 1 : 1 - 1/(2 phi)


You can see a clear mathematical pattern such that the frequency of the occurence of each of the 64 codons in the human genome is not random at all. The ratios follow the sequence -


1 - 1/(2 phi) + 1/(2 phi) - 1/(2 phi) + 1/(2 phi) - 1/(2 phi)


Why, on earth should the total number of each of the 64 codons in a human being follow such a clear and definite pattern. Given the complexity of a human being, and the supposedly "random path of evolution" this is the last thing you would expect - that the number of each of the 64 parts that make up our genome should be contrained to follow a perfect mathematical pattern. It is almost as if every "atom" has been counted. This is probably one of the most remarkable things I have ever seen.



Articles and Papers

Here is an article on Perez that I found quite useful in helping me to understand what he has discovered. It is written by a friend of his, and I made a copy and saved it to my website.

http://www.craigdemo.co.uk/perez.htm


You can read Perez's paper here - http://www.resurgence.be/pdf/ADN-perez.pdf


Also here - http://www.matematicasmisticas.com/D...aryScience.pdf



I have carefully studied his paper, and his findings are truely accurate and remarkable. Not only are perfect symmetries revealed, but also these symmetries are based on the ratios 1 and phi (the Golden Ratio). I would highly recommend reading and making a copy of the paper linked to above.




Where did this pattern come from??

Such balances seem to indicate that arithmetic preceded life itself, and had a part in it's creation.

To quote Perez -

 
Quote:
We offer here an amazing law which comes down to: « The respective POPULATIONS of each of 64 codons constituting the whole human genome are CONTROLLED by LOCATIONS of these same codons inside the ” Universal Genetic Code ” map ».

Effectively; by analysing the distribution of frequencies in an exhaustive way for each of 64 codons of the genetic code inside the single strand of DNA which results from the end to end concatenation of our 24 chromosomes, it appears, strangely enough, that the populations of these hundreds of million of codons are controlled by their respective and definite locations within the universal genetic code table. The universal genetic code table would constitute therefore a kind of “structure”, or “frame” of the “MATRIX” among which the respective LOCATIONS and POSITIONS of each one of 64 codons WOULD D_E_T_E_R_M_I_N_E the exact POPULATIONS of these same codons! The unforeseen means which allowed us to throw into relief this relationship is a scientific result resembling more the domain of « strangeness and mathematical games » rather than that of “hard” renowned sciences such as Genetics: the “DRAGON curve”. The 6 successive embedded foldings, according to successive dichotomies of the dragon’s curve applied to the respective populations – on the scale of whole human genome – of each of the 64 codons ordered according to the genetic code map go on then to reveal the omnipresence of 2 kinds of dual attractors with remarkable values. We conclude from this therefore that each of positions of the 64 codons within the universal genetic code table WOULD DETERMINE respective population values of these same codons within the whole human genome.
Quote:
This is very strange. Everything unfolds as if the populations held concurrently by the 64
codons in the whole human genome scale are a self-similar fractal projection of the
original universal genetic code primitive matrix.

What Perez is saying here is that the frequencies of occurrence of each of the 64 codons in the ENTIRE HUMAN GENOME reflect the simple structure of the universal genetic code table in accordance with a very simple mathematical pattern centred on the ratios 1 and 0.691457. This is absolutely bizarre, since the universal genetic code table is common to all life from the most primitive to the most advanced. In effect, the supposedly ancient genetic code table appears to predict, precisely, the number of each codon in the entire human genome. Vica versa, one could say that the total number of each of the codons that make up the human genome are somehow contrained to follow a clear mathematical sequence pattern. This is extremely odd, and is an extraordinarily strong indication of "design". There seems to be nothing random about the genetic code at all - even down to the number of codons in the entire genome!

 

Quote:
A fundamental conclusion that can be drawn from the relationships that Dr Perez has discovered is that the DNA sequences of all organisms must have emerged, or have been created, as a whole. They have in other words not emerged through random chemical reactions. I believe Dr Perez has here discovered something that simply cannot be accommodated by the previous scientific paradigm that looks upon biological evolution as a whim of nature. This discovery alone has so wide-ranging ramifications for all of biology, and especially molecular biology, that it should prompt researchers either to refute his claims or to widen the framework of their own analysis.

It is through this holism that it becomes clear that Dr Perez’ work is part of a new scientific revolution, one that brings us back to a meaningful view of the universe, which has a source that we may call « intelligent ». Seattle, August 22, 2009,
Carl Johan Calleman, Ph.D.

It is one thing for the genome to come about by chance and possess just the right functions to support life. It is quite another thing for the elements of the genome to also be in proportions that follow pure mathematical pattern through and through.


 

Quote:
It may be important to note that Jean-claude Perez does not consider himself a creationist: his main question is:

"How is the mystery of Life emerging? By Self-organization or God? Yet certainly not by Random Chance or Hazard! Another pending second question is related to the central role played by INTEGER NUMBERS, the GOLDEN RATIO, and MATHEMATICS in hidden rules of LIFE..." "My main research is "SELF-ORGANIZATION" and then, could self-organization explain the genesis of LIFE? Presently, after nearly 30 years of research around this central question, I have no consistent response..."

Here is the Wiki on Perez -http://creationwiki.org/Jean-claude_Perez


Summary Conclusion

The 64 codons that make up our genome can be arranged just like a chess board 8 x 8. The frequency with which each of these codons occurs within the human genome is also determined by the "chess board". It is almost like we are "walking chess boards".

I am fairly sure that this 4 x 4 x 4 aspect of our design has some connection to the 288 x 288 x 288 or Genesis 1 creation.

In his paper, Perez provides the individual frequencies of occurrence of each codon. A careful study of these frequencies will undoubtedly reveal other patterns and symmetries. If you have a calculator, you might want to take a closer look at this table and see what emerges........



For each codon, the large number is the actual number of times that codon occurs in the human genome.

Who knows what you will find.