So we can see how the columns divide symmetrically into 2 x 703 and 2 x 666

Notice that the rows also have a symmetrical arrangement, such that row 1 = row5 and row 2 = row 4. What this means is that a horizontal line drawn through the centre of the table will divide the masses so that there is equal mass on both sides. And that mass just happens to be 703 + 666 or 37 x 37

Here is a peer review of these discoveries that I received from Steve Coneglan. I believe that it is important to publish peer reviews since the scientific method insists upon such a process for evaluating new findings.
 

Dear Craig,

Excuse me for saying this, but I was right when I said that your discoveries with the numbers from the genetic code are an outstanding piece of work.
I feel privileged that our recent conversations via email have prompted you to review your findings.
I had a feeling you might strike another rich vein of gold.
That hunch has proven correct.
The hat is off.
Well done!

As ever, I checked your findings with a fine-toothed comb.
I'm not the kind of person who just accepts someone's word when it comes to this kind of thing.
For peer review purposes, I like all the strengths and weaknesses of an argument to be out in the open.
Your latest findings have passed the muster, and brilliantly so, adding another incredible chapter to the story of the genetic code.

I individually checked the molecular weights for each of the 20 standard amino acids on Wikipedia.
There were a few extremely slight errors in the weights of 5 amino acids that you quoted in the table you created.
Amazingly, when these are adjusted to the Wikipedia values, exact divisions of the number 037 eventuate.
Let me give you the details of the amendments that need to be made to the molecular weights for 5 of the amino acids.
After you have considered the adjustments, perhaps you might want to comment on the exactness of the number 037 at your webpage.
After all is said and done, the discovery is yours.

These are the 5 amino acids whose values should be adjusted in your table to reflect the values found for each at Wikipedia:


1.Tryptophan (W): 204.23
2.Isoleucine (I): 131.17
3.Histidine (H): 155.15
4.Leucine (L): 131.17
5.Glutamine (Q): 146.14

By adjusting the values for these 5 amino acids in your table, the following data apply in respect of the columns:

Column 1:


1.Aspartic acid: 133.1
2.Arginine: 174.2
3.Lysine: 146.19
4.Histidine: 155.15
5.Glutamic acid: 147.13

The total for Column 1 is:


•133.1 + 174.2 + 146.19 + 155.15 + 147.13 = 755.77

Column 2:


1.Asparagine: 132.12
2.Phenylalanine: 165.19
3.Tyrosine: 181.19
4.Tryptophan: 204.23
5.Glutamine: 146.14

The total for column 2 is:


•132.12 + 165.19 + 181.19 + 204.23 + 146.14 = 828.87

Column 3:


1.Alanine: 89.09
2.Proline: 115.13
3.Threonine: 119.12
4.Serine: 105.09
5.Glycine: 75.07

The total for Column 3 is:


•89.09 + 115.13 + 119.12 + 105.09 + 75.07 = 503.5

Column 4:


1.Leucine: 131.17
2.Isoleucine: 131.17
3.Methionine: 149.21
4.Cysteine: 121.16
5.Valine: 117.15

The total for Column 4 is:


•131.17 + 131.17 + 149.21 + 121.16 + 117.15 = 649.86

From the Wikipedia data, the totals for all four columns are:


1.755.77
2.828.87
3.503.5
4.649.86

The following sums apply:


•Column 1 + Column 4 = 755.77 + 649.86 = 1405.63 = (2 x 703) - 0.37
•Column 2 + Column 3 = 828.87 + 503.5 = 1332.37 = (2 x 666) + 0.37
•Column 1 + Column 2 + Column 3 + Column 4 = 755.77 + 828.87 + 503.5 + 649.86 = 2738 = 2 x 37 x 37

The adjusted totals for the 5 rows are:


1.485.48
2.585.69
3.595.71
4.585.63
5.485.49

Incredibly, the combined molecular weight for all 20 amino acids comes out to an exact integer.
That integer is 2738.
There is no decimal remainder.

I have not read Rakocevic, so I have no idea why you created the table as a 4 x 5 template.
Does this grouping have something to do with the properties of the amino acids?
What I do know is that the difference between the sums for Columns 1 + 4, and Columns 2 + 3, is mediated by a remainder of 0.37.
This difference of 0.37 mediates the sums from being exact integer multiples of 37.
Tweaking your table to reflect these amended values might be a good idea.
The witness that Wikipedia offers to your values would be of inestimable value.
Also, I feel the function of the adjustment number 0.37 adds a bit more spice to proceedings.

Taking stock, we know from Shcherbak's work that there are 2735 nucleons total in the 20 canonical amino acids.
Allowing for the proline adjustment, in which Boulay's hypothesis is the most stimulating, 1480 of these nucleons make up the 20 bases.
We also know that these can be arranged through symmetrical positionings of the 64 codons to produce many sums that are multiples of 037.

Boulay's proline hypothesis is worth commenting on here.
He posits a neutron from the radical functioning as a proton as it connects to the base.
In this schema, we would have an extra proton (in the base) and one less neutron (in the radical).
This means that the nucleon count remains unaffected.
However, it creates an extra atom, as a single proton equates to a hydrogen atom.
If Boulay is correct, some form of exchange might be going on at the quark level to change a neutron into a proton.
This suggests that information, data processing, is at work at the subatomic level.
Even more interesting is what this does at the atomic level.
An extra hydrogen atom adjusts for the total number of atoms in the 64 codons.
Without Boulay's hypothesis, there are 1143 atoms total in the 64 codons.
With Boulay's adjustment, the four extra hydrogen atoms coded for the four proline codons bring that number up to 1147 = 31 x 37.

Returning to Shcherbak's numerical discoveries.
What your latest finding, via Rakocevic, adds to the work of Shcherbak is the fine tuning.
The decimal appendages for the molecular weights of the 20 canonical amino acids sum to 3.00.
This supplements the nucleon number of 2735, bringing it up to 2738, as 2735 + 3.00 = 2738.
It is hard to fully grasp the simplicity and the beauty of this.
Even the nucleon number gets tweaked by the actual molecular weight remainders to come to an exact multiple of 037.
Thus, Shcherbak, Rakocevic and Boulay all point to the primacy of the number 037.
Words fail me.

You have not exaggerated when you write, "I know with absolute conviction now that the genetic code is the work of the Biblical Creator."
Thank you so much for sharing your findings, Craig.

Stephen Coneglan

Stephen Coneglan used Wikipedia to get the most accurate molecular weights of the Amino Acids. In doing so, he has discovered that Rakocevic's pattern is even more precise and profound. The Genesis 1 pattern is precisely embodied.

"And the Word was made flesh"

The total molecular weight of all 20 amino acids comes to precisely 2738 = 2 x 37 x 37. This means that the average molecular weight for each amino acid is
37 x 3.7 precisely.

We see many balances and symmetries in the table. All the balances are centred on 37 x 3.7 (the average molecular weight for all 20 amino acids)

What is really, really incredible is how the table embodies the numbers 703 and 666 in such a symmetrical way.

• The two outer columns = 2 x 703
• The two inner columns = 2 x 666
   
• The two outer columns + two inner Columns = 2 x 37 x 37
• The two outer columns - two inner columns = 2 x 37
   
• The upper half = 703 + 666
• The bottom half = 703 + 666

a perfect embodiment of the Genesis 1 v 1 pattern

Oddly enough, Stephen used Wikipedia to obtain the exact molecular weights, he found that the columns summed as follows

Column 1 and 4

2 x 703 - 0.37      

Column 2 and 3

2 x 666 + 0.37      

This is interesting because 666 + 37 = 703 and 703 - 37 = 666. It is uncanny that the columns should balance in this way ie 703 - 0.37 and 666 + 0.37

Look at this

(2 x 703 - 0.37) + (2 x 666 + 0.37) = 2 x 37 x 37 exactly

(2 x 703 - 0.37) - (2 x 666 + 0.37) = 2 x 37 exactly

Certainly these findings command our attention.

What we are looking at here does not seem like chance at all.

Craig Paardekooper
March 2010